Maybe I'm wrong but that's a reasonable thought process to have with those numbers. The fact that there are a handful out of several hundred thousand owners complaining leads me to believe most don't care. Nothing was "wild" about anything I said. My assumption is that adding a $6 dollar add-on isn't going to boost sales. Words have meaning and context is important. Probable - having more evidence for than against, or evidence that inclines the mind to belief but leaves some room for doubt I am presenting a possible solution to a PR problem, based on logic and a regard for positive outcomes for all parties involved while acknowledging no guarantee of said outcomes. The difference is you are presenting wild assumptions as facts.
The Jason DLC showing up in-store was said to be an accident both times, but many players wondered why there would even be a listing for the content in the stores at all if it was supposed to be a backer-exclusive item, especially after the game's team firmly stated that it'd never be sold again.Ursprünglich geschrieben von Jack Rabbit Slim:Now you're just being petty, so let me clarify something then I'm done with this tangent. Several backers had issues receiving their bonus content, and the content also had a similarly brief sale on the PlayStation 4 version through the PlayStation store where players who bought it were permitted to keep it before the listing was removed.
Since the game came out back in May, Savini Jason has been a point of contention for players due to the way that it was released and the individualized attributes that it came with. Calling it a skin would imply that it has purely cosmetic changes, and while it definitely changes the way that Jason looks, it also gives him his own set of strengths and weakness like the other Jason versions do. The Savini Jason is a skin that was supposed to be exclusive to those who backed the game during the very early phases of development, but it's really much more than a skin.
0 kommentar(er)
